A
fter 80
years of isolation, Russia's Zapovedniks are beginning to
seize the attention of "adventure tourists" worldwide.
During the Soviet period, strict limitations and
prohibitions against entering nature reserves helped to
protect nature in its wild state. Today, with more
relaxed international borders and changes in the
management regime of these reserves, Zapovedniks are more
accessible to "ecotourists" and can offer a wilderness
experience unparalleled in the world.
Ecotourism, which
encompasses a range of activities including scientific
tours, student internships, trips for nature lovers,
bird-watching trips, and filming expeditions, is a
relatively new phenom enon in Russia. One of the first
tours occurred in 1992, when a British film crew shot
footage of the Amur tiger in Lazovski Zapovednik in the
Russian Far East.
In 1995 a feasibility study on ecotourism was conducted
in the Russian Far East within the framework of the
Environmental Policy and Technology (EPT) project. This
study revealed great poten tial to develop ecotourism as
an attrac tive and economically viable activity. Also, it
concluded that ecotourism, taking the need for resource
conserva tion into account, was the most logical type of
tourism to promote in the region.
The following year, in 1996, the Russian Programme Office
of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) launched a
project for the development of ecotourism in the
Primorski (Maritime) Region of the Russian Far East
(please refer to the accompanying article
[in the Biodiversity Briefings] "WWF- Ecotourism
Project: Lessons Learned from the Russian Far East ).
The project demonstrated that although there are
divergent opinions about ecotourism development in nature
reserves, many Zapovednik managers view the idea
positively and believe that they could be successful in
organizing ecotours.
Under
the right circumstances, ecotourism can greatly enhance
the activities of Russia's nature reserves. For instance,
ecotourism can play an important role in environmental
education. Zapovedniks in the Primorski Region are now
beginning to realize that their work cannot be successful
without the understanding and strong support of the
general public. Ecotourism offers an effective tool in
raising public awareness: nothing is more effective in
encouraging respect for protected areas than direct
personal experience with nature. Ecotourism may also take
the form of scientific tours, which open the door to the
international scientific community and opportunities to
start joint projects.
Besides its educational value, ecotourism can provide an
additional source of finan cial support sorely needed
during this time of drastic budget cuts in governmen tal
funding for protected areas. Because ecotourism does not
require extensive infrastructure, it is not a great
imposition on the Zapovednik; it can provide revenue with
minimal initial investments. In addition to the basic fee
paid by tourists, Zapovedniks occasionally receive
supplemental donations or other contribu tions from
guests who realize that a little extra funding can be of
great help to the Zapovednik.
The benefits of ecotourism also extend beyond the reaches
of the Zapovedniks. Following the dissolution of the
Soviet Union, many regional economic activities have
collapsed. Faced with high unemployment, local
communities have begun to depend on traditional economic
activities such as keeping livestock, haymaking, and
hunting. Ecotourism can help alleviate the negative
influence of these activities on nearby protected areas
by providing an alternative economic incentive for the
local people.
One of greatest advantages of ecotourism development is
its minimal negative ecological impact. Most of the
ecotourists visiting Zapovedniks are very conscious of
the area's fragility. Experience has shown that if
tourists are informed about the rules and regulations in
a protected area, it is highly likely that they will
observe them. Moreover, ecotourists set positive examples
for local people by gathering litter left on the trails
and hauling it back to the villages.
Nonetheless, a certain compromise always exists between
ecotourism development and the conservation of completely
intact wilderness areas. In order to minimize negative
consequences of ecotourism and maximize its benefits,
serious planning and preparation are required. The number
of tourists in Zapovedniks should be limited and
regulated through a detailed selection process. The
organization of long and highly specialized (and more
expensive) ecotours for a few groups seems to be the most
appropriate option for Zapovedniks.
Another way to reduce the effects of ecotourism is to
restrict tourists to the buffer zones of the Zapovedniks,
areas surrounding the core protected area in which some
limited human activities are permitted. This allows the
Zapovednik to maintain a strict nature protection regime
and conduct scientific research on the primary part of
their territory. Ecotourism in the buffer zone does not
necessitate the construction of large, new lodges on the
territory of the Zapovedniks. Rather, accommodations
could be arranged in bordering villages with host
families, an option often more desirable for ecotourists
who wish to become acquainted with local culture as well
as nature. Thus, if properly organized, it is evident
that ecotourism can simultaneously meet conservation,
education, publicity, and economic objectives of the
Zapovednik.
Elena
Nikitina is the coordinator of the
ecotourism project within WWF's Russian
Far East Program.
(Her
other article from this section discussed the WWF
Ecotourism Project: Lessons Learned from the Russian Far
East.)