|

The following appeared in RCN
#18
Voice
from the Wild
(Letter from the Editors)
In
our last
Voice from the Wild
we focused on the critical financial and social woes
plaguing Russia today and the heavy toll that this has taken
on conservation efforts, especially on the system of
Zapovedniks. We wrote that the coming months would, indeed,
be difficult for conservationists, protected areas managers,
scientists, and many others in the environmental field. Our
predictions, unfortunately, have been on mark. As winter is
nearing an end, so are the Zapovednik's last resources. Both
financial and human resources are being rapidly exhausted as
increasingly more has to be done with increasingly less to
keep the Zapovedniks afloat. Sadly, even though many
Zapovedniks are on the verge of going under, the Russian
government seems completely apathetic to their
fate.
Today, the 1999
federal budget passed by the Duma and the Council of the
Federation has allocated tenuous funds for the Zapovedniks.
This year they will receive 40 percent below the minimal
amount required to support them. The financial strangulation
of the Zapovedniks may be easily traced in figures: in 1993,
only 2.1 percent of the total federal budget was allocated
to funding for ecological programs, including Zapovedniks.
This year, that figure has shrunk to a shocking 0.1
percent.
Despite the
difficulties caused by the economic crisis, enthusiastic
authors throughout Russia and northern Eurasia continue to
write to us, wishing to share their experiences, knowledge,
and struggles. We have reports from two regions, the Black
Sea and the Caucasus, that NGOs are strengthening their
cooperative efforts in conservation to create regional
environmental networks. Although these networks may be
informal, they signal the continued interest and commitment
to conservation at the grassroots level.
In this issue of RCN,
as in many others before it, we bring you stories that well
illustrate the determined resolve and dedication of
individual conservationists working against so many odds to
preserve and defend Russia's environment. Perhaps the most
striking story in this issue is the account of Alexandr
Nikitin and Grigory Pasko. While Nikitin has received wide
international attention and support, Pasko's case is less
known but equally disturbing. These two men disclosed
shocking accounts of the disposal of radioactive wastes by
the Russian military in the Barents Sea and the Seas of
Okhotsk and Japan. In reporting the facts that point to
their own government's environmental atrocities, Nikitin and
Pasko faced charges of treason and espionage and have paid
the consequences in jail. Their cases show us, once again,
the critical role which Russia's environmentalists play in
forming, testing, and defining Russia's fledging &emdash;
and sometimes faltering &emdash;democracy.
|